|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Fan1
Senior Member
 Number of posts: 367
Age: 18
Friend code: 2706~9250~3736
Registration date: 2007-10-11
 |  Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL  Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:53 am | |
| | Pokerob wrote: | We have a rough idea of our team now.
I see you have 6 slots for yours, its 5 slot surely? |
Hoping it will be 7 but at this rate looks like it will be 5.
Still waiting for responses. |
|
  | |
joey
Member
Number of posts: 85
Age: 21
Power Ranking: C+ class
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Candy Chart
Candy:
    (5/1000)
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:09 am | |
| sure count me in, but i'm rusty <.< |
|
| | |
Pokerob
Member
Number of posts: 24
Registration date: 2008-06-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:18 am | |
| 7 would be good for us. I hate to pick between these guys who are as good as each other. _________________  |
|
| | |
Fan1
Senior Member
Number of posts: 367
Age: 18
Friend code: 2706~9250~3736
Registration date: 2007-10-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:22 am | |
| Just waiting for two more responses, hopefully we can do seven.
At the moment looks like it will be 5 v 5. |
|
| | |
Riku
Member
Number of posts: 16
Registration date: 2008-06-14
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:52 am | |
| | Pokerob wrote: | | 7 would be good for us. I hate to pick between these guys who are as good as each other. |
Especaily since one of them has spent the last few weeks getting his gym team ready <.<
Anyway are we playing with the item clause on or off then? |
|
| | |
Seiryuu
Newbie
Number of posts: 7
Registration date: 2008-06-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:12 pm | |
| Seir from PWL ~.^ cant believe i missed this topic,
im not fussed about no item clause, sub item clause was just the lovechild of a massive topic we had over using item clause or not, |
|
| | |
Fan1
Senior Member
Number of posts: 367
Age: 18
Friend code: 2706~9250~3736
Registration date: 2007-10-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:29 pm | |
| | Riku wrote: | | Pokerob wrote: | | 7 would be good for us. I hate to pick between these guys who are as good as each other. |
Especaily since one of them has spent the last few weeks getting his gym team ready <.<
Anyway are we playing with the item clause on or off then? |
We have decided it will be off. |
|
| | |
Seiryuu
Newbie
Number of posts: 7
Registration date: 2008-06-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:37 pm | |
| fine by me, im sure most of our battlers wouldnt mind too much. |
|
| | |
zoobzor
Member
Number of posts: 17
Registration date: 2008-04-02
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:05 pm | |
| is this where i post? then i fight in war! |
|
| | |
Pokerob
Member
Number of posts: 24
Registration date: 2008-06-11
| | Subject: Re: WWPL v PWL Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:11 am | |
| I prefer if we stop at 6. If there is a draw at like 3-3 then will just make the guys who won their battle play in the next round. _________________ |
|
| | |
|
